1969 | 1970
| 1971 | 1972
| 1973 | 1974
1969
Student Legal Services was created in 1969
by a group of fourteen University of Alberta law students
who were inspired by the student legal assistance clinics
emerging at law schools throughout Canada and the U.S.
It officially opened on May 1 of that year at the Boyle
Street Community Services Cooperative and the Edmonton
Day Center. The objectives of the project were to increase
awareness of legal rights, provide actual legal assistance
where possible, and to inform the diverse community
living on Boyle Street of the resources that were available
to them. In the first four months, SLS handled over
100 cases ranging from criminal matters to welfare disputes
and tenancy problems. In the meantime, SLS workers were
also assisting inmates at the Fort Saskatchewan Correctional
Centre with their Legal Aid applications. By 1970, offices
had been set up in the Student’s Union Building
(SUB), the Legal Aid office, and the Norwood Readiness
Centre.
1970
By 1970, SLS had set up offices in the Student’s
Union Building at the University of Alberta, the Legal
Aid office, Norwood Readiness Centre and in Fort Saskatchewan.
Practitioners from the local legal community were recruited
to act as volunteer advisors. Divided into teams of
three students and one lawyer, the projects would remain
open each night at each station despite the complete
absence either of funding or administrative facilities.
There was an immense response from the practicing Bar.
Most major firms had a member involved in the work SLS
was doing.
1971
In 1971, SLS received its first substantial grant - $50
000 from the federal government’s Opportunities
For Youth (OFY) program – and moved from simply
giving information and assisting volunteer lawyers to
actually running trials themselves. A school bus was purchased
for $50 and painted in psychedelic colors. Permanently
situated in the West-10 parking lot, it became the Jasper
Place office. The system of ad hoc volunteer advising
lawyers was supplemented by an official advising lawyer
– Denny Thomas. Mr. Thomas not only brought the
experience that he had working with legal aid clinics
in Britain, but he provided an answer to the concerns
of the Law Society and practicing Bar about “quality
control”.
A day after SLS made its first ever appearance in Small
Claims Court, Jim Robb appeared in Highway Traffic Court
where he successfully defended his principal against
a failure to stop at a red light charge. It was not
until SLS argued its first provincial court appearance,
a vagrancy charge, that its standing to be in that court
was challenged. The issue of whether SLS had a right
to participate in the justice system had already been
a hot debate. While the legal profession was concerned
about competition, the Law Society wondered whether
such activity violated the Legal Profession Act. The
lawyer that SLS had in place to argue for the status
of SLS status in Court was never needed, the judge was
convinced that SLS members were authorized to appear
in Court by the express provision in the Criminal Code
allowing agents to appear for individuals charged with
Summary Conviction offences.
In the early summer of 1971, several members continued
to work for SLS despite the lack of any funding. Many
found themselves being housed and fed by their sympathetic
classmates, spending all the money they had on polyester
professional attire from Army & Navy. Their driving
force was the purpose they found in taking direction
from the impoverished. The emerging concept of “community
outreach” whereby immovable institutions would
go out into the community to contact people in need
on their own terms caught hold of SLS. They did not
tell the poor what they needed, but listened to them
instead. Many of their initiatives were done without
any personal recognition. Problems that did not have
a legal answer were given a non-legal solution. SLS
members set up a competitive alternative to “Tax
Discounters”, helping individuals file their own
taxes. They also documented the phenomenon whereby food
prices would increase when welfare cheques were issued.
There was an ongoing debate over whether the best impact
could be made by taking a case-by-case approach or a
long-term legal reform approach. In the end, both approaches
were adopted, the latter manifesting itself in the Welfare
Project headed by Brian Kaliel. In these pre-Charter
days, individuals such as welfare recipients were treated
extremely poorly, and there was no end to the issues
that SLS could confront. SLS members were active in
the establishment of the Boyle Street Co-op –
assisting in the drafting of the by-laws which eventually
led to the federal Department of Health and Welfare
financing the Co-op. On the reform front, John Faulkner
and Jim Robb spent three days in the Faust / Drift Pile
area investigating discriminatory practices involving
treaty vs. non-treaty natives. They took their findings
to the press, which resulted in changes being made to
hunting rights and welfare payments.
Another major internal issue at the time was the preservation
of student control. Offers of funding were always viewed
in light of the strings that may come with accepting
money. As well, a scheme whereby students would receive
school credit for SLS casework was rejected because
it was seen as a potential loss control of SLS out of
the hands of the students. This lack of affiliation
with the Faculty of Law was the factor that distinguished
SLS from the other student legal clinics that were being
established across Canada. At an conference of law student
run antipoverty groups put on in Ottawa by Osgoode Hall,
SLS members were seen as the radicals.
SLS received its Certificate of Incorporation as a
Society under the Society’s Act in 1971.
1972
In 1972, SLS moved out of the Bissell Centre
and into the new Boyle Street Co-op.
$10 000 obtained from Health and Welfare Canada went
to several publications, including a booklet called
“The Welfare Game”, a pamphlet for hitchhikers
called the “Blue Book for Travellers” and
a pamphlet on welfare rights called the “Rules
of the Game”. A part time secretary was also hired.
SLS joined forces with Native Outreach in creating a
fair employment agency that allowed the worker to retain
his or her full wage rather than receiving less than
half of the money that employment agencies were recieving.
Attempts were also made to unionize native trappers
in Fort McMurray.
At the courthouse, SLS workers noticed that a number
of individuals were appearing in docket court without
lawyers. As a result, SLS workers began visiting the
courthouse to inform people of their rights. They also
assisted John Faulker (a former SLS chairperson) in
drafting a report which was sent to Legal Aid proposing
a system of free legal advisors at the courthouse. Duty
Counsel would arrive on scene a few years later. SLS
also began making appearances before administrative
bodies such as Edmonton City Council and the Police
Commission. The Student Divorce Program was also started
this year, whereby students would help individuals fill
out their paperwork and hand it to a lawyer to take
to court.
The Faculty of Law took notice of this substantial
work. The Dean of the Faculty of Law, who had previously
been unsupportive of SLS, now proposed that the faculty
take over SLS. Fearing that such a takeover would threaten
the very existence of its integral legal reform projects,
Jim Robb and others took the matter before the President
of the University and succesfully fought to save its
independence.
1973
Steering Committee – Dave Finlay (Chair), Brian
Burrows, Barbara Romaine, Douglas Lynass, Ron Liteplo,
Charles Campbell, Peter Jasper, Jim Brimacombe, Andy Sims
In 1973, SLS workers began visiting a Law class at
Victoria Composite High School, hoping that the knowledge
gained by the students would filter into the community.
That same year, a project to force the City of Edmonton
to demolish many condemned houses still standing in
the Boyle area had much success. While SLS workers continued
to asssist individuals in court (2 866 cases that year),
an effort was undertaken to get a Legal Education project
off the ground. The first internal training handbook
was prepared, as were publications on landlord/tenant
matters and sale of goods.
That year, each of the projects confined their activities
to the immediate community in which they were located.
The Boyle location devoted their attention to Boyle
Street residents, West-10 volunteers worked exclusively
with West-10 residents. All overflow was handled by
the SUB office.
Denny Thomas left SLS in 1973 and was replaced by John
Faulkner and Lois Gander. The battle for the right to
assist people in court continued, this time the issue
was accessibility to Family Court, which was eventually
allowed.
1974
Steering Committee – John James (Chair),
Beverly Brown, Peter Jasper, Laird Hunter, Terry McCrum,
Wendy Kennedy, Doug Thompson and Robert Nowack
In 1974, the newly-formed Alberta Law Foundation (ALF)
provided the first of many sizable grants. The SLS budget
went from $30 000 to $90 000. This allowed for expansion
of the organization and increased interest from law
students. Over 30 students were hired on for the summer.
The Dickensfield office, a pilot project initiated by
John James, opened its doors. John Faulkner was also
doing some piloting that year. On a grant from the Alberta
Law Foundation, he and James flew a light aircraft throughout
Northern Alberta to examine the availability of legal
assistance to members of remote communities. Although
they had to visually navigate the aircraft by flying
at 300 feet and following power lines, the trip was
a success and their subsequent report led to increased
funding for members of Alberta’s remote communities.
The West-10 project was running mock trials, lectures
and educational seminars, and pressuring slum landlords
in the Jasper Place community to shut down. That project
was also working on the Calder Neighborhood Improvement
Project, a group of Calder residents trying to obtain
federal funds to improve their community. SLS was also
involved in Calder’s successful campaign to defeat
a commercial zoning bylaw which residents were opposed
to.
|